NEW YORK—The controversial Fairness in Apartment Rental Expenses (FARE) Act went into effect yesterday (June 11) in New York City after a federal judge denied a request from the Real Estate Board of New York and others to delay the law’s implementation.
The Gothamist reported that Judge Ronnie Abrams denied a request from the REBNY and a collection of brokerages and landlords to pause the law while a lawsuit played out, stating that the “remedy is through the political process, not in court.”
Abrams also dismissed all but one of the arguments against the law’s implementation, noting the City Council’s intent in enacting the law was to “address a specific harm” that broker fees impose on tenants, according to The Gothamist.
The FARE Act prohibits brokers who represent landlords from charging broker fees to tenants. This includes brokers who publish listings with the landlord’s permission. Landlords or their agents must disclose other fees that the tenant must pay in their listings and rental agreements.
The measure was passed by the New York City Council overwhelmingly in November 2024 over the objections of REBNY, the New York State Association of Realtors and the Hudson Gateway Association of Realtors, as well as individual brokerage firms and landlord groups.
In response to the law going into effect, REBNY released a fact sheet (below) on the law’s key elements.
- Landlord's Brokers Cannot Collect Commissions From Tenants: A broker representing a landlord cannot charge a tenant a broker fee in connection with a rental transaction. We strongly advise that brokers revisit their agreements with landlords where commissions are paid by the tenant.
- The FARE Act Does Permit Compensation in Other Broker Relationships: The FARE Act permits compensation in the following rental relationships: (1) a tenant may pay a tenant’s broker, (2) a landlord may pay a landlord’s broker, and (3) a landlord may pay a tenant’s broker.
Brokers should clearly enter into agency relationships with the party that they represent. The use of the NYS Agency Disclosure Form and Compensation Agreements will be very helpful in this regard. For example, where a broker is representing a tenant, the broker should provide the NYS Agency Disclosure form indicating that the broker is representing the tenant, and the broker should enter into a Compensation Agreement with the Tenant. Dual agency is permitted in certain circumstances.
- All Tenant Fees Must be Disclosed: Rental listings must include all fees to be paid by the prospective tenant for the rental of the unit.
Additionally, prior to lease signing, landlords or their agents must disclose a list of all fees payable to the landlord in connection with the rental. The list must include a short description of each fee, and the list must be signed by the tenant, and retained by the landlord (or their agent) for three years.
While waiting for guidance from the NYC Department of Consumer and Worker Protection as to what fees should be included, we strongly advise being overly inclusive concerning any landlord-imposed fees that the tenant may encounter during the tenancy. The list should include prospective fees such as lost key, pet charges, move-in/move-out, etc.
- Presumption of Landlord Permission Upon Listing Publication and its Impact on the RLS: The FARE Act presumes that any broker publishing a rental listing does so with the permission and authority of the landlord of that rental unit. Brokers must ensure they have the landlord’s permission and authority to publish a rental listing to avoid unnecessary disputes with the landlord.
Nonetheless, we want to ensure that rental listings may still be submitted to the RLS to the maximum extent possible under the FARE Act. Rental listings where the landlord is offering compensation to the tenant broker should be entered in the RLS as standard active listings. Rental listings where the landlord will not offer compensation to the tenant broker should be entered in the RLS as “Participant Only Network” listings.
- Compliance and Enforcement: The Department of Consumer and Worker Protection (DCWP) is the agency that enforces and issues fines for violations of the FARE Act. Additionally, violations of the FARE Act could also be pursued through lawsuits brought by ordinary individuals seeking damages and/or injunctive relief for alleged violations of the FARE Act.
- Financial Penalties for Non-Compliance: Violations of the FARE Act may result in financial penalties of up to $2,000.”